Update jest-extended 3.2.4 → 4.0.0 (major)#4664
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Codecov ReportPatch and project coverage have no change.
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4664 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.47% 88.47%
=======================================
Files 295 295
Lines 26290 26290
Branches 7097 7097
=======================================
Hits 23260 23260
Misses 2818 2818
Partials 212 212 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Member
|
@depfu rebase |
45902f4 to
2adce43
Compare
canova
approved these changes
Jun 19, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here is everything you need to know about this upgrade. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.
What changed?
✳️ jest-extended (3.2.4 → 4.0.0) · Repo · Changelog
Release Notes
4.0.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 29 commits:
Version Packages (#605)Back-fill changesets (#612)Change unknown to any in toHaveBeenCalledBefore and toHaveBeenCalledAfter (closes #552)Lock file maintenanceLock file maintenancefeat: support typings for vitest 0.31.0 (#600)Lock file maintenanceUpdate docusaurus monorepo to v2.4.1 (#583)Lock file maintenancechore: run CI on Node 20 (#601)Lock file maintenanceLock file maintenanceLock file maintenanceLock file maintenanceRename toHaveBeenCalledOnceWith to toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith (closes #529) (#574)Fix exported type, resolve "is not a module" error in ts (#559)Lock file maintenanceLock file maintenanceLock file maintenanceUpdate dependency typescript to v5 (#581)Lock file maintenanceLock file maintenanceLock file maintenanceLock file maintenanceFix toHaveBeenCalledOnceWith messages (#572)Lock file maintenancechore: always run code coverage actionchore: group sandpack updates togetherchore: run CI with Node 19 (#569)Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
@depfu rebase.All Depfu comment commands